







This article is the second installment in a series exploring the impact of US tariffs on China on the export methods and pricing of Chinese ESS battery cells to the US, examining three approaches: "direct export from China, re-export via Malaysia, and domestic production in the US." The previous article mentioned that despite the current uncertainty surrounding US tariffs on China, the existing ESS tariff measures are divided into three periods: May 14, 2025, August 13, 2025, and January 1, 2026, with tariffs set at 40.9%, 64.9%, and 82.4%, respectively.
This article, the second in the series, aims to analyze the impact of price changes on Chinese-made ESS battery cells exported directly, re-exported via Malaysia, and potentially produced domestically in the US using LFP for ESS storage from August 13, 2025, to January 1, 2026. Some data values are theoretical, which may result in seemingly high outcomes. The author will explain the reasons for each data value in detail to enable readers to substitute relevant data independently for more targeted conclusions. A subsequent article, the third in the series, will analyze the price impact of tariffs after January 1, 2026.
Taking domestically produced 280Ah LFP ESS battery cells as an example:
The data sources and changes for each segment are shown in the table below: Direct export from China to the US:
The data sources and changes for each segment are shown in the table below: Re-export from China via Malaysia to the US:
The data sources and changes for each segment are shown in the table below: Domestic production of LFP battery cells in the US:
Based on the above calculations, considering the price of 0.609 yuan/Wh for battery cells exported directly from China from August 13, 2025, to January 1, 2026, re-exporting via Malaysia offers a 7.5% price advantage, while the cost of directly producing ESS battery cells in the US remains 4.6% higher than in China.
The above summary is as follows:
Note: Some calculated data were obtained through discussions and processing in the market, while more data were sourced from the average prices at various price points on the SMM official website. Additionally, in current practical operations, the cost increases resulting from US tariffs on China are mainly borne by overseas customers. Therefore, the results calculated in this article may be higher than the actual transaction prices.
SMM New Energy Industry Research Department
Wang Cong 021-51666838
Ma Rui 021-51595780
Feng Disheng 021-51666714
Lv Yanlin 021-20707875
Zhou Zhicheng 021-51666711
Zhang Haohan 021-51666752
Wang Zihan 021-51666914
Wang Jie 021-51595902
Xu Yang 021-51666760
Chen Bolin 021-51666836
For queries, please contact Lemon Zhao at lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please email service.en@smm.cn